Key result
Primary angioplasty performed by high-volume physicians reduced in-hospital mortality by 57% compared to low-volume physicians (adjusted RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.83).
Why the study?
Does primary angioplasty performed by high-volume physicians and hospitals reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Population
1,342 patients who underwent primary angioplasty within 23 hours of onset of acute myocardial infarction…
Comparison
Primary angioplasty performed by high-volume… vs Primary angioplasty performed by low-volume…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
In-hospital
Authors
Loading...
May improve AMI survival with high-volume operators; extends prior volume-outcome data but leaves practice change open.
Observational (n=1,342)
Yes
Does primary angioplasty performed by high-volume physicians and hospitals reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: RR 0.43 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.83)
Higher volume of primary angioplasty procedures performed by physicians and/or hospitals is associated with a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate for patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Vakili et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=1,342). Primary angioplasty by high-volume physicians vs. Primary angioplasty by low-volume physicians was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.83). Primary angioplasty performed by high-volume physicians reduced in-hospital mortality by 57% compared to low-volume physicians (adjusted RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.83).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: