Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background The use of ChatGPT in the field of otolaryngology is increasing; however, there are not enough studies related to cochlear implants. Aim/objectives To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT (GPT-4o) responses to questions about cochlear implantation, evaluating its potential role in patient education. Material and methods A total of 104 questions across five categories (basic, preoperative, surgical, postoperative care, postoperative expectations) were selected from reliable online sources. Each was posed twice to ChatGPT-4o in separate sessions. Responses were graded by two reviewers for accuracy (comprehensive/correct, partially correct, misleading, or incorrect/irrelevant). Reproducibility was assessed based on consistency across sessions. Discrepancies were resolved by a third expert reviewer. Results Of 104 responses, 84.6% were correct, 5.8% partially correct, 6.7% misleading, and 2.9% incorrect. Reproducibility was 88.4% overall and 100% in the surgery category. No significant differences were found between question categories for accuracy (p = 0.829) or reproducibility (p = 0.348). Conclusion and significance ChatGPT provided highly accurate and reproducible responses to cochlear implant-related questions, supporting its use as an educational tool. Nonetheless, expert review remains essential for complex or critical topics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eroğlu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: