Key result
A model combining FMR, age, and LAA emptying velocity predicts post-CPVA AF recurrence with ~0.89 AUC.
Why the study?
The study aimed to construct a prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation to predict AF recurrence in PAF patients after post-circular pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation.
Can a prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation and echocardiographic parameters predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after CPVA in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=289)
Can a prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation and echocardiographic parameters predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after CPVA in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
A novel prediction model incorporating functional mitral regurgitation severity, age, and left atrial appendage emptying velocity demonstrates high accuracy in predicting AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal AF.
May aid post-CPVA risk stratification in paroxysmal AF; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
AIM: To construct a prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after the post-circular pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation (CPVA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 289 patients with PAF who underwent CPVA for the first time. The patients were randomly divided into modeling group and verification group at the ratio of 75:25. In the modeling group, the multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze and construct a prediction model for post-CPVA recurrence in PAF patients, which was then validated in the verification group. RESULTS: (1) After 3-6 months of follow-up, the patients were divided into sinus rhythm group (252 cases) and recurrence group (24 cases); (2) In the modeling group, the age, left atrial diameter (LAD), and the degree of MR (mild, moderate, severe) were higher in recurrence group than that of the sinus rhythm group, and the left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAV) was lower in recurrence group (all p < .05). (3) A model for predicting the recurrence of PAF after radiofrequency ablation was constructed in the modeling group. The equation was: Logit(P) = -3.253 + .092 × age + 1.263 × mild MR + 2.325 × moderate MR + 5.111 × severe MR -.113 × LAAV. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was .889 in modeling group and .866 in verification group, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > .05). CONCLUSION: The prediction model of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after CPVA in PAF patients has good predictive efficacy, specificity, and accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng et al. (2022) conducted an observational in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (n=289). Prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation was evaluated on Recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after CPVA. A prediction model incorporating functional mitral regurgitation, age, and left atrial appendage emptying velocity accurately predicted AF recurrence after CPVA (AUC 0.889).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: