Key result
Longitudinal BP indices predict CV outcomes better than single-occasion measurements.
Why the study?
Longitudinal blood pressure data may provide incremental prognostic value over single-occasion blood pressure, but the strengths, weaknesses, and clinical utility of various indices needed evaluation.
Does the assessment of long-term longitudinal blood pressure exposure improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction compared to single-occasion blood pressure?
Does the assessment of long-term longitudinal blood pressure exposure improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction compared to single-occasion blood pressure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal blood pressure indices offer incremental prognostic value over single-occasion measurements for predicting cardiovascular risk, though clinical implementation remains challenging.
Observational and interventional studies have unequivocally demonstrated that "present", i.e. single-occasion, blood pressure is one of the key determinants of cardiovascular disease risk. Over the past two decades, however, numerous publications have suggested that longitudinal blood pressure data and assessment of long-term blood pressure exposure provide incremental prognostic value over present blood pressure. These studies have used several different indices to quantify the overall exposure to blood pressure, such as time-averaged blood pressure, cumulative blood pressure, blood pressure trajectory patterns, and age of hypertension onset. This review summarises existing research on the association between these indices and hard cardiovascular outcomes, outlines the strengths and weaknesses of these indices, and provides an overview of how longitudinal blood pressure changes can be measured and used to improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction.KEY MESSAGESNumerous recent publications have examined the relation between cardiovascular disease and long-term blood pressure (BP) exposure, quantified using indices such as time-averaged BP, cumulative BP, BP trajectory patterns, and age of hypertension onset.This review summarises existing research on the association between these indices and hard cardiovascular outcomes, outlines the strengths and weaknesses of these indices, and provides an overview of how longitudinal BP changes can be measured and used to improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction.Although longitudinal BP indices seem to predict cardiovascular outcomes better than present BP, there are considerable differences in the clinical feasibility of these indices along with a limited number of prospective data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuotio et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Longitudinal blood pressure indices vs. Present (single-occasion) blood pressure was evaluated on Cardiovascular outcomes. Longitudinal blood pressure indices, such as cumulative BP and trajectory patterns, appear to predict cardiovascular outcomes better than single-occasion blood pressure measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: