Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify genetic predictors of heart failure progression and the efficacy and safety of treatment with candesartan.
Do genetic variants predict the progression of heart failure or the efficacy and safety of candesartan in patients with NYHA class II-IV heart failure?
Observational (n=2,727)
Double-blind
Randomised
Yes
Do genetic variants predict the progression of heart failure or the efficacy and safety of candesartan in patients with NYHA class II-IV heart failure?
A genome-wide association study identified a candidate genetic variant (rs66886237) that may predict heart failure progression in patients with preserved ejection fraction, though no significant genetic predictors of candesartan efficacy or safety were found.
Should not guide candesartan use or risk stratification yet; leaves open validation of rs66886237 for HFpEF progression.
Aims The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme consisted of three parallel, randomised, double-blind clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with heart failure (HF) categorised according to left ventricular ejection fraction and tolerability to an ACE inhibitor. We conducted a pharmacogenomic study of the CHARM studies to identify genetic predictors of heart failure progression and the efficacy and safety of treatment with candesartan. Methods We performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure in 2727 patients from CHARM-Overall and stratified by CHARM study according to preserved and reduced ejection fraction. The safety endpoints were hyperkalaemia, renal dysfunction, hypotension, and change in systolic blood pressure. We also conducted a genome-wide gene-level collapsing analysis from whole-exome sequencing data with the composite cardiovascular endpoint. Results We found the genetic variant rs66886237 at 8p21.3 near the gene GFRA2 to be associated with the composite cardiovascular endpoint in 1029 HF patients with preserved ejection fraction from the CHARM-Preserved study [hazard ratio (HR): 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55-2.35; P=1.7×10 -9 ], but not in patients with reduced ejection fraction. None of the GWAS for candesartan safety or efficacy passed the significance threshold. Conclusions We have identified a candidate genetic variant potentially predictive of the progression of heart failure in patients with preserved ejection fraction. The findings require further replication and we cannot exclude the possibility that the results may be chance findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dubé et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=2,727). Candesartan vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.55-2.35, p=1.7x10-9).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: