Key result
Ramipril prevented the early increase in left ventricular mass after DC shock compared to control (-0.48 vs +0.73 g/kg, P=0.004), an effect blocked by the bradykinin antagonist HOE 140.
Why the study?
Does bradykinin antagonism inhibit the antiremodeling effect of ramipril in a dog model of myocardial necrosis?
Does bradykinin antagonism inhibit the antiremodeling effect of ramipril in a dog model of myocardial necrosis?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.48% vs 0.73%
p-value: p=0.004
The prevention of early left ventricular mass increase by ramipril in a canine model of myocardial necrosis is dependent on the preservation of bradykinin.
No immediate clinical implications; extends bradykinin mediation of ramipril antiremodeling in canine necrosis models.
BACKGROUND: Converting enzyme inhibitor (CEI) therapy, but not angiotensin II subtype I receptor blockade, has been shown to attenuate left ventricular remodeling in the dog after transmyocardial direct current (DC) shock. The purpose of this study was to address the importance of preservation of bradykinin to the antiremodeling effect of CEI treatment in this model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four hours after DC shock, adult mongrel dogs were assigned to one of three groups: a control group; a group treated with ramipril 10 mg BID; and a group treated with ramipril 10 mg BID along with a continuous subcutaneous infusion of HOE 140, a bradykinin antagonist. To assess change in left and right ventricular structure, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was performed 4 weeks after DC shock and compared with a baseline MRI study performed before DC shock. The increase in left ventricular mass (mean +/- SEM) in the control group was similar to that observed in the CEI-HOE 140 group (+0.73 +/- 0.19 versus +0.75 +/- 0.18 g/kg, P = NS), but both were greater than the change in mass in the ramipril group (-0.48 +/- 0.13 g/kg, P = .004 and P = .0005, respectively). No significant change occurred in left ventricular volume or right ventricular structure in any group. Mean arterial pressure was reduced by ramipril compared with the control group (-8 +/- 2 versus +7 +/- 2 mm Hg, P = .03), and this effect was not blunted by the addition of HOE 140 (-7 +/- 3 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: Prevention by ramipril of the early increase in left ventricular mass in the DC shock model appears to be related to the preservation of bradykinin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McDonald et al. (1995) studied Transmural myocardial necrosis. Ramipril with or without HOE 140 vs. Control was evaluated on Change in left ventricular mass (p=0.004). Ramipril prevented the early increase in left ventricular mass after DC shock compared to control (-0.48 vs +0.73 g/kg, P=0.004), an effect blocked by the bradykinin antagonist HOE 140.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: