Key result
Combined LV-GLS and RV-GRS predicts major events with 85% sensitivity in ischaemic cardiomyopathy with EF >35%.
Why the study?
LV ejection fraction is a poor predictor for arrhythmic events in ICM patients evaluated for ICD implantation, and supplementary prognostic parameters are missing.
Does non-contrast magnetic resonance feature tracking improve the prediction of cardiovascular mortality and appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=242)
Does non-contrast magnetic resonance feature tracking improve the prediction of cardiovascular mortality and appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy?
CMR feature tracking-derived LV-GLS and RV-GRS provide significant prognostic value for predicting cardiovascular mortality and appropriate ICD therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with LVEF >35%, a group where standard LVEF is a poor predictor.
May refine risk stratification beyond LVEF in ischaemic cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding therapy.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of feature tracking (FT) derived cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) strain parameters of the left ventricle (LV)/right ventricle (RV) in ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Current guidelines suggest a LV-ejection fraction ≤35% as major criterion for ICD implantation in ICM, but this is a poor predictor for arrhythmic events. Supplementary parameters are missing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients (n = 242), who underwent CMR imaging prior to primary and secondary implantation of ICD, were classified depending on EF ≤ 35% (n = 188) or >35% (n = 54). FT parameters were derived from steady-state free precession cine views using dedicated software. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality (CVM) and/or appropriate ICD therapy. There were no significant differences in FT-function or LV-/RV-function parameters in patients with an EF ≤ 35% correlating to the primary endpoint. In patients with EF > 35%, standard CMR functional parameters, such as LV-EF, did not reveal significant differences. However, significant differences in most FT parameters correlating to the primary endpoint were observed in this subgroup. LV-GLS (left ventricular-global longitudinal strain) and RV-GRS (right ventricular-global radial strain) revealed the best diagnostic performance in ROC curve analysis. The combination of LV-GLS and RV-GRS showed a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 76% for the prediction of future events. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of FT derived measurements in the risk stratification of patients with ICM depends on LV function. The combination of LV-GLS/RV-GRS seems to be a predictor of cardiovascular mortality and/or appropriate ICD therapy in patients with EF > 35%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Overhoff et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n=242). Feature tracking derived CMR strain parameters (LV-GLS and RV-GRS) vs. Standard CMR functional parameters was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular mortality (CVM) and/or appropriate ICD therapy. The combination of LV-GLS and RV-GRS predicted cardiovascular mortality and/or appropriate ICD therapy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients with EF > 35% with 85% sensitivity and 76% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: