Key result
CMR LVEDVi >27 ml/m2 predicts successful primary biventricular repair in borderline LV hypoplasia with ~88% accuracy.
Why the study?
Bi-ventricular repair is viable in some patients with borderline LV hypoplasia, but CMR criteria predictive of successful primary Bi-V repair in neonates without significant MV or AV stenosis needed identification.
Do CMR criteria (LVEDVi and QAo) predict successful primary biventricular repair in neonates with borderline LV hypoplasia without significant MV/AV stenosis?
Cohort (n=37)
Do CMR criteria (LVEDVi and QAo) predict successful primary biventricular repair in neonates with borderline LV hypoplasia without significant MV/AV stenosis?
CMR parameters LVEDVi > 27 ml/m2 and QAo > 1.9 l/min/m2 are prognostic for successful primary biventricular repair in neonates with borderline LV hypoplasia without significant MV/AV stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CMR thresholds for primary biventricular repair decisions; leaves open need for prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: Bi-ventricular (Bi-V) repair is viable in some patients with borderline left ventricular (LV) hypoplasia. We aimed to identify cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) criteria predictive of successful primary Bi-V repair in neonates with borderline LV hypoplasia without significant mitral valve (MV) & aortic valve (AV) stenosis. METHODS: Retrospective study (2003-2024) of patients with borderline LV hypoplasia with CMR for decision-making. Patients MV stenosis (mean Doppler gradient >5 mmHg) and/or AV stenosis (peak Doppler gradient >20 mmHg) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: primary Bi-V repair and hybrid procedure. Outcomes were categorized as successful primary Bi-V repair, successful staged Bi-V repair and failure to achieve Bi-V repair. RESULTS: About 23/37 patients (62%) underwent successful primary Bi-V repair, 8/37 (22%) underwent staged Bi-V repair and 6/37 (16%) failed to achieve Bi-V repair. The successful primary/staged Bi-V repair group had higher LVEDVi (P < 0.002), higher blood flow volume through the ascending aorta (P < 0.012) and higher QAo/superior vena cava (QSVC) flow ratio (P = 0.034) compared to the failure to achieve Bi-V repair group. CMR LVEDVi cut-off of 27 ml/m2 had 87% sensitivity and 79% specificity (AUC 87.6%), and QAo threshold of 1.9 l/min/m2 had 65.2% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity (AUC 86.0%) for predicting successful primary Bi-V repair. About 7/31(22%) patients with Bi-V repair underwent reinterventions for LVOT obstruction & MV stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with borderline LV hypoplasia without MV/AV stenosis, CMR LVEDVi > 27 ml/m2 & QAo > 1.99 l/min/m2 were prognostic for successful primary biventricular repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
House et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Borderline left ventricular hypoplasia without significant aortic or mitral stenosis (n=37). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) criteria (LVEDVi and QAo) was evaluated on Successful primary biventricular (Bi-V) repair (AUC 87.6% (LVEDVi); AUC 86.0% (QAo), p=<0.002). CMR LVEDVi >27 ml/m2 (AUC 87.6%) and QAo >1.9 l/min/m2 (AUC 86.0%) were predictive of successful primary biventricular repair in neonates with borderline LV hypoplasia without MV/AV stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: