Key result
Low mitral valve orifice area independently predicted adverse outcomes after biventricular repair, while 2-year freedom from the primary outcome was 53% for AVC vs 69% for non-AVC (P=0.12).
Why the study?
Identifying risk factors for biventricular repair in children with hypoplastic left ventricles has been challenging.
Does preoperative mitral valve orifice area measured by CMR predict adverse outcomes in children with hypoplastic left ventricles undergoing biventricular repair?
Cohort (n=122)
Does preoperative mitral valve orifice area measured by CMR predict adverse outcomes in children with hypoplastic left ventricles undergoing biventricular repair?
Preoperative CMR measurement of low mitral valve orifice area (z-score <-2) is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes in children with hypoplastic left ventricles undergoing biventricular repair.
Low MV orifice area z-score <-2 was associated with adverse outcomes after biventricular repair; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding decisions.
BACKGROUND: Identification of risk factors for biventricular (BiV) repair in children with hypoplastic left ventricles (HLV) has been challenging. We sought to identify preoperative cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) predictors of outcome in patients with HLVs who underwent BiV repair, with a focus on the mitral valve (MV). METHODS: ) and no endocardial fibroelastosis who underwent BiV repair from 2005-2022. CMR measurements included MV orifice area in diastole. The primary composite outcome included time to death, transplant, BiV takedown, heart failure admission, left atrial decompression, or unexpected reoperation; and the secondary outcome included more than or equal to moderate mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 0.7 (interquartile range 0.1, 2.2) years. Of 122 patients [59 atrioventricular canal (AVC) and 63 non-AVC] age 3 ± 2.8 years at the time of BiV repair, freedom from the primary outcome at 2 years was 53% for AVC and 69% for non-AVC (log rank p = 0.12), and freedom from the secondary outcome at 2 years was 49% for AVC and 79% for non-AVC (log rank p < 0.01). Independent predictors of primary outcome for AVC patients included MV orifice area z-score <-2 and transitional AVC; for non-AVC patients, predictors included MV orifice area z-score <-2, abnormal MV anatomy, and conal-septal ventricular septal defect. Independent predictors of secondary outcome for AVC patients included older age at surgery, transitional AVC, and transposition of the great arteries. CONCLUSION: In children with HLV, low MV orifice area and pre-existing MV pathology are risk factors for adverse outcome after BiV repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liddle et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Hypoplastic left ventricles (n=122). Atrioventricular canal (AVC) vs. Non-AVC was evaluated on Freedom from death, transplant, BiV takedown, heart failure admission, left atrial decompression, or unexpected reoperation at 2 years (p=0.12). Low mitral valve orifice area independently predicted adverse outcomes after biventricular repair, while 2-year freedom from the primary outcome was 53% for AVC vs 69% for non-AVC (P=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: