By the use of a fluorogenic thrombin substrate and continuous calibration of each individual sample, it is now possible to obtain a thrombin generation (TG) curve (or thrombogram) in plasma, with or without platelets, in an easy routine procedure at high throughput and with an acceptable experimental error (<5%). Evidence is growing that the parameters of the thrombogram, and notably the area under the curve (endogenous thrombin potential, ETP), are useful in assessing bleeding- or thrombotic risk and its modification by antithrombotic- or haemostatic treatment. Available data strongly suggest that conditions (congenital, acquired, drug-induced) that increase TG all cause a thrombotic tendency and that conditions that decrease TG prevent thrombosis but, beyond a limit, cause bleeding. Diminution of TG is a common denominator of all antithrombotic treatment, including anti-platelet drugs. The thrombogram can also be used as a tool in the search for new antithrombotics and reflects the haemorrhagic or thrombotic side effects of other drugs (e.g. oral contraceptives). The thrombogram thus is a promising new approach to clinical management of bleeding and thrombotic disease as well as a tool in drug research and epidemiology. Our experience at this moment is insufficient, however, to already clearly define its limits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dieri et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: