Key result
Novel sex-specific waist circumference cut-offs optimally predict subclinical CVD, differing from traditional metabolic syndrome thresholds.
Why the study?
Increased waist circumference predicts cardiovascular events, but optimal cut-off values for predicting subclinical cardiovascular disease assessed by carotid intima-media thickness needed to be determined.
What are the optimal waist circumference cut-off points for predicting subclinical cardiovascular disease (increased carotid intima-media thickness) in rural African adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,318)
No
What are the optimal waist circumference cut-off points for predicting subclinical cardiovascular disease (increased carotid intima-media thickness) in rural African adults?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.767 (95% CI 0.685-0.848)
p-value: p=<0.001
Traditional waist circumference cut-off points used for metabolic syndrome diagnosis may not be optimal for predicting subclinical atherosclerosis (increased CIMT) in rural African adults.
May support ethnicity-specific WC thresholds for subclinical CVD detection in rural Africans; hypothesis-generating, requiring prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Increased waist circumference (WC) is one of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors used to predict cardiovascular events. Waist circumference cut-off values for predicting metabolic syndrome and other cardiovascular risks have been previously studied. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is one of the cardiovascular risk factor recently described and reported to be suitable as it is a direct measurement of vascular quality. Hence the aim of the present study was to determine the optimal WC cut-off point for the prediction of subclinical CVD. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional study using quantitative methods, conducted among 1318 adults aged between 40 and 60 years old, residing in a rural Black population in Limpopo province. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness measurements were performed using a LOGIQ ultrasound system (GE Healthcare, CT, USA). Waist Circumference (WC) (cm) was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm. Bivariate correlation, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic were analysed using the statistical package for social sciences version 26.0 software. RESULTS: Among the total population, 69% were women and 31% men with a mean age of 53 ± 7 years. Among women, WC at a cut-off value of 95 cm gave the highest sensitivity of 57%, the specificity of 55% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.588. In men, an optimum WC cut-off point of 82 cm yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity at 72% and 70% respectively, with an AUC of 0.767 p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The traditional waist circumference cut-off points (94 cm for women and 80 cm for men) that are currently used for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome might not be suitable in the prediction of an increased CIMT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ringane et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical cardiovascular disease (n=1,318). Waist circumference vs. Traditional waist circumference cut-offs was evaluated on Optimal waist circumference cut-off for predicting increased carotid intima-media thickness (≥0.80 mm) in men (AUC 0.767, 95% CI 0.685-0.848, p=<0.001). Waist circumference cut-offs of 82 cm in men and 95 cm in women optimally predicted subclinical cardiovascular disease, differing from traditional metabolic syndrome cut-offs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: