Key result
Waist circumference is linked to incident CVD optimally at specific sex-based thresholds.
Cohort (n=6,504)
Yes
Locally defined waist circumference cut-off values (90 cm for men, 97 cm for women) are more appropriate for predicting CVD risk in the Iranian population than internationally recommended values for the Middle East.
May support Iranian-specific WC thresholds in local CVD risk models; hypothesis-generating and leaves validation open before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Due to the lack of compelling evidence for waist circumference (WC) as a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor in many ethnic groups, the need for local research has been expressed by international authorities. This study was undertaken to determine the optimal cut-off points of WC for predicting incident CVD and metabolic syndrome in an Iranian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6,504 participants from three areas in central Iran were followed over 7 years. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to identify the maximum value of sensitivity and specificity combinations corresponding to the appropriate cut-off points of WC for the detection of the metabolic syndrome and CVD events. The optimal cut-off values were defined as the point at which the value of "sensitivity+specificity-1" reached the maximum value. Finally, Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to determine which cut-off point was better fit in the CVD risk prediction model. RESULTS: After 394,418 person-years of follow-up, 427 incident primary CVD events (233 men) were identified. Considering CVD, the optimum cut-off points were 99/103.5 cm (men/women) but these had a low sensitivity (AUC: 0.59, 95%CI 0.55-0.63 in both men and women). The second highest values for discriminating CVD were 93/97 cm that resulted in acceptable sensitivity. Regarding the metabolic syndrome, 92.6/97.8 cm were identified as optimum (AUC: 0.67, 95%CI 0.65-0.69 in men and 0.65, 95%CI 0.63-0.67 in women). The best cut-off values that fit in the Cox regression model were 90/97 cm. CONCLUSION: International recommended WC cut-off values for the Middle East are not appropriate compared to the locally defined cut-off values in Iran.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talaei et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome (n=6,504). Waist circumference vs. Lower waist circumference was evaluated on Incident primary cardiovascular disease events (AUC 0.59, 95% CI 0.55-0.63). Waist circumference cut-off values of 90 cm for men and 97 cm for women were identified as the optimal thresholds for predicting incident cardiovascular disease events in an Iranian population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: