Key result
The optimal waist circumference cutoff for diagnosing metabolic syndrome in rural Iraqi adults was determined to be 97 cm in men and 99 cm in women.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,000)
No
The optimal waist circumference cutoff for diagnosing metabolic syndrome in rural Iraqi adults is 97 cm for men and 99 cm for women, highlighting the need for population-specific criteria.
Supports population-specific waist cutoffs for metabolic syndrome in rural Iraq; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
BACKGROUND: The determination of cutoff points for healthy waist circumference (WC) is of paramount importance for prevention, optimum management, and prognostication of obesity, the metabolic syndrome (MetS), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and coronary heart disease. The aim of this project was to establish the cutoff level for WC in rural Basrah in Iraq, one of the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East (Arab) populations. METHODS: This was a community-based, cross-sectional survey for establishing the normal value for WC among a rural district population in Basrah (Abu-Al-khasib), Iraq. A stratified sampling procedure was used for sample selection. RESULTS: The cutoff level yielding maximum sensitivity and specificity for predicting the presence of multiple risk factors was 97 cm in men and 99 cm in women. Sensitivity and specificity using these cutoff values were 70% and 50%, respectively, in men and 70% and 45%, respectively, in women. CONCLUSION: We propose the optimal cutoff point for WC for the diagnosis of MetS in the Iraqi adult rural population as 99 cm in women and 97 cm in men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mansour et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome (n=1,000). Waist circumference was evaluated on Optimal waist circumference cutoff yielding maximum sensitivity and specificity for predicting multiple metabolic risk factors. The optimal waist circumference cutoff for diagnosing metabolic syndrome in rural Iraqi adults was determined to be 97 cm in men and 99 cm in women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: