Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: This paper examines health expenditure growth under two alternative policy approaches: competition-based managed care and state government rate regulation. METHODS: Data are presented on cumulative growth in real per capita health expenditures between 1980 and 1991 so as to compare California, a state with a pro-competitive policy, with the US average and with four states with established regulation programs. RESULTS: Real per capita expenditures for hospital services in the United States grew 54% between 1980 and 1991, while in California the growth was half the national rate, or 27%. Real per capita expenditures for physician services and drug expenditures in the United States grew by 82% and 65%, respectively, while in California these expenditures increased only 58% and 41%, respectively. California's growth rate was below that of all four regulatory states for all measures of health care cost inflation. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these findings, a properly structured competitive approach could play a significant role in controlling health expenditures in the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melnick et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: