... the critic, guided by personal predilection or more often by partisan conventionalism, will take some one procedure as his criterion or judgment and condemn all deviations from it as departures from art [read: research] itself. He then misses the point of all art, the unity of form and matter, and misses it because he lacks adequate sympathy, in his natural and acquired one-sidedness, with the immense variety of interactions between the live creature and his world. (p. 313)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony Kelly (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: