Key result
Water pipe smoking links to comparable hs-CRP and endothelial dysfunction as cigarette smoking.
Why the study?
Does water pipe tobacco smoking affect hs-CRP levels and endothelial function differently compared to cigarette smoking in male subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=77)
Does water pipe tobacco smoking affect hs-CRP levels and endothelial function differently compared to cigarette smoking in male subjects?
p-value: p=0.19 for hs-CRP, 0.91 for FMD
Water pipe smoking and cigarette smoking are associated with comparable degrees of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, highlighting the cardiovascular risks of water pipe use.
Supports cautioning patients on water pipe smoking similarly to cigarettes; leaves open independent high-risk prediction in observational data.
Cigarette smoking is a well known risk factor for cardiovascular disease, however, little is known regarding water pipe (WP) smoking. High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and flow mediated dilatation (FMD) are well recognized methods to assess cardiovascular risks. To study the effect of WP smoking on hs-CRP level and endothelial function compared to cigarette smoking. The study included 77 male subjects (30 WP smokers, 30 cigarette smokers, and 17 controls). Hs-CRP level was measured using the ELISA technique and the threshold of high risk level was 3 mg/l. FMD was assessed in the brachial artery. Subjects with FMD < 10% were considered to have endothelial dysfunction. The composite of high risk hs-CRP level and endothelial dysfunction was considered as high risk profile. Hs-CRP level was slightly higher in smokers than controls (2.21 ± 1.6 versus 1.73 ± 1.19 mg/l, P = 0.25). FMD was significantly lower in smokers (12 ± 6.66 versus 17.45 ± 11.29%, P = 0.016). There were no significant differences between WP smokers and cigarette smokers regarding hs-CRP level (P = 0.19) and FMD (P = 0.91). In an adjusted regression model, age (P = 0.002) and cigarette smoking (P = 0.046) were found to be significant predictors for high risk profile, whereas WP smoking did not have a predictive effect (P = 0.91). WP smokers and cigarette smokers had comparable degrees of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. However, cigarette smoking was a stronger predictor for high risk profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diab et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk (n=77). Water pipe tobacco smoking vs. Cigarette smoking was evaluated on High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level and flow mediated dilatation (FMD) (p=0.19 for hs-CRP, 0.91 for FMD). Water pipe smoking resulted in comparable hs-CRP levels (P=0.19) and endothelial dysfunction (P=0.91) to cigarette smoking, though cigarette smoking better predicted a high-risk profile (P=0.046).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: