Key result
ECGI total atrial conduction time <148 ms is linked to a ~68% reduction in arrhythmia recurrence.
Why the study?
Current methods for diagnosing atrial cardiomyopathy are complex and limited in widespread use, prompting the assessment of non-invasive body surface electrocardiographic imaging as a novel diagnostic tool.
Does non-invasive body surface electrocardiographic imaging accurately diagnose atrial cardiomyopathy compared to endocardial mapping in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=39)
Does non-invasive body surface electrocardiographic imaging accurately diagnose atrial cardiomyopathy compared to endocardial mapping in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 82.4% vs 45.5%
p-value: p=0.019
Non-invasive ECGI measurement of total atrial conduction time accurately diagnoses atrial cardiomyopathy and predicts arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.
Non-invasive TACT <148 ms may stratify recurrence risk after PVI; leaves open validation versus endocardial mapping for ACM diagnosis.
AIMS: Atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) is associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and increased risk for stroke. At present, diagnosis of ACM is feasible by endocardial contact mapping of left atrial (LA) low-voltage substrate (LVS) or late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, but their complexity limits a widespread use. The aim of this study was to assess non-invasive body surface electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) as a novel clinical tool for diagnosis of ACM compared with endocardial mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients (66 ± 9 years, 85% male) presenting for their first PVI for persistent atrial fibrillation underwent ECGI in sinus rhythm using a 252-electrode-array mapping system. Subsequently, high-density LA voltage and biatrial activation maps (mean 2090 ± 488 sites) were acquired in sinus rhythm prior to PVI. Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence was assessed within 12 months follow-up. Increased duration of total atrial conduction time (TACT) in ECGI was associated with both increased atrial activation time and extent of LA-LVS in endocardial contact mapping (r = 0.77 and r = 0.66, P < 0.0001 respectively). Atrial cardiomyopathy was found in 23 (59%) patients. A TACT value of 148 ms identified ACM with 91.3% sensitivity and 93.7% specificity. Arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 15 (38%) patients during a follow-up of 389 ± 55 days. Freedom from arrhythmia was significantly higher in patients with a TACT <148 ms compared with patients with a TACT ≥148 ms (82.4% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Analysis of TACT in non-invasive ECGI allows diagnosis of patients with ACM, which is associated with a significantly increased risk for arrhythmia recurrence following PVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eichenlaub et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=39). Non-invasive body surface electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) vs. Endocardial contact mapping was evaluated on Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence (p=0.019). Non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging using a total atrial conduction time <148 ms was associated with higher freedom from arrhythmia recurrence compared to ≥148 ms (82.4% vs. 45.5%, P=0.019).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: