Why the study?
Does a computerized clinical decision support-enabled smart order set improve prescription of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis and reduce symptomatic VTE in patients admitted to a Medicine service?
Population
1,942 consecutive patients admitted to the Medicine service.
Comparison
Mandatory computerized clinical decision… vs Standard practice prior to the implementation of…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
90 days post-discharge
Authors
Loading...
Supports smart order sets for VTE prophylaxis in medicine services; leaves open whether randomized trials confirm VTE reduction.
Does a computerized clinical decision support-enabled smart order set improve prescription of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis and reduce symptomatic VTE in patients admitted to a Medicine service?
Implementation of a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for VTE prophylaxis significantly improved guideline-concordant prescribing and reduced symptomatic VTE events without increasing bleeding risk.
Zeidan et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: