Key result
Routine echocardiography in healthy young adults showed slightly higher left ventricular end-systolic diameter (31.2 vs 30.7 mm; P<0.0001) compared to echocardiography for clinical referrals.
Why the study?
Do M-mode echocardiographic values differ between young healthy individuals undergoing routine screening versus those referred for abnormal clinical findings?
Cross-Sectional (n=7,042)
Do M-mode echocardiographic values differ between young healthy individuals undergoing routine screening versus those referred for abnormal clinical findings?
Young healthy individuals with abnormal clinical findings have slightly different M-mode echocardiographic characteristics compared to those with normal findings, though the differences are small.
Small LVESD differences should not alter reference standards; leaves open whether referral status affects norms in young adults.
OBJECTIVES: To determine normal M-mode values in healthy young adults and to evaluate whether these values differ among those in whom echocardiography was performed routinely and those in whom echocardiography was performed based on clinical grounds. METHODS: A cross-sectional study evaluating a large cohort of young academy applicants of the Israeli air force in the years 1994-2010. Studies were divided into those performed routinely and those performed because of abnormal ECG or physical examination findings. Echocardiographic variables were compared between the two groups and values are expressed as mean ± SD. RESULTS: Echocardiography was performed routinely in 3525 applicants (age 18.5 ± 1.0 years) and following a clinical referral in 3517 applicants (age 18.2 ± 0.9 years). Those in whom echocardiography was performed routinely had slightly higher left ventricular end-systolic diameter (31.2 ± 3.3 vs. 30.7 ± 3.4 mm; P < 0.0001) and aortic root diameter (28.5 ± 2.1 vs. 27.9 ± 2.2 mm; P < 0.0001), and slightly lower left ventricular mass index (108.8 ± 15.8 vs. 109.9 ± 16.5 g/m; P = 0.005). No differences were noted between the two groups in left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, posterior wall thickness and interventricular septum thickness. CONCLUSION: Certain M-mode characteristics may differ (although to a slight degree) in young healthy individuals with electrocardiographic and physical findings compared with those with normal physical examination and electrocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grossman et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy young adults (n=7,042). Routine echocardiography vs. Clinical referral echocardiography was evaluated on M-mode echocardiographic values. Routine echocardiography in healthy young adults showed slightly higher left ventricular end-systolic diameter (31.2 vs 30.7 mm; P<0.0001) compared to echocardiography for clinical referrals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: