Key result
Complementary radial tagging improves contrast over standard tagging, achieving acceptable image quality in ~98% of cases.
Why the study?
Does complementary radial tagging improve myocardial tagging contrast compared to standard radial tagging in cardiac imaging?
Does complementary radial tagging improve myocardial tagging contrast compared to standard radial tagging in cardiac imaging?
Complementary radial tagging improves myocardial tagging contrast throughout the cardiac cycle and is feasible in nearly all patients.
CRT may enhance tag contrast in routine cardiac MRI; leaves open prospective validation of diagnostic utility.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate complementary radial tagging (CRT) for improved myocardial tagging contrast. METHODS: We sought to develop and evaluate CRT, which aims to preserve the radial tag contrast throughout the cardiac cycle. Similar to complementary spatial modulation of magnetization, CRT acquires two sets of images with a phase shift in the tag pattern. The combination of a ramped imaging flip angle and image subtraction enhances tag contrast throughout the cardiac cycle. The proposed CRT technique uses a small table shift away from the isocenter to improve the uniformity of the radial tag pattern. We provide a mathematical solution for the optimal table shift and validate the solution in using a retrospective analysis of images from 500 patients in the Cardiac Atlas Project database. RESULTS: CRT simulations, phantom experiments, and in vivo images all demonstrate the improved tag contrast of CRT compared to RT. The retrospective evaluation demonstrated that acceptable CRT images could be acquired in over 98% of the clinical exams. CONCLUSION: The CRT technique improves radial tag contrast throughout the cardiac cycle and should produce high quality tag patterns in nearly all patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2014) studied Healthy volunteers and cardiac MRI patients (n=510). Complementary radial tagging (CRT) vs. Radial tagging (RT) was evaluated on Tag contrast and optimal table position. Complementary radial tagging (CRT) improved radial tag contrast throughout the cardiac cycle compared to standard radial tagging, with retrospective analysis indicating acceptable image quality in over 98% of clinical cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: