Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In software testing, generating test data is quite expensive and time-consuming. The manual generation of an appropriately large set of test data to satisfy a specified coverage criterion carries a high cost and requires significant human effort. Currently, test automation has come at the cost of low quality. In this paper, we are motivated to propose a model-based approach utilizing the activity diagram of the system under test as a test base, focusing on its data flow aspect. The technique is incorporated with a search-based optimization heuristic to fully automate the test data generation process and deliver test cases with more improved quality. Our experimental investigation used three open-source software systems to assess and compare the proposed technique with two alternative approaches. The experimental results indicate the improved fault-detection performance of the proposed technique, which was 11.1% better than DFAAD and 38.4% better than EvoSuite, although the techniques did not differ significantly in terms of statement and branch coverage. The proposed technique was able to detect more computation-related faults and tends to have better fault detection capability as the system complexity increases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaffari et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: