Key result
Left atrioventricular coupling index predicts heart failure hospitalization but not MACE in chronic coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of the CMR-measured left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) for predicting cardiovascular events in chronic coronary syndrome was unknown.
Does left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) predict major adverse cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause death in patients with chronic coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=613)
No
Does left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) predict major adverse cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause death in patients with chronic coronary syndrome?
Effect estimate: HR 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.02)
p-value: p=0.07
LACI measured by CMR provides incremental prognostic value for predicting heart failure hospitalization and all-cause death in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, beyond traditional risk factors and imaging parameters.
LACI does not predict MACE in chronic coronary syndrome; leaves open its association with heart failure hospitalization.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI), measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with CCS who underwent CMR stress testing between 2008 and 2018. LACI was defined as the ratio of left atrial end-diastolic volume to left ventricular end-diastolic volume. Additionally, global longitudinal strain was obtained. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), including cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization for heart failure (HFH) and all-cause death. RESULTS: In the cohort of 613 patients (81.2% male, median age 70 (63-76) years), 81 (13.2%) experienced MACE after a median follow-up of 5.6 (4.2-6.8) years. LACI was not significantly associated with MACE (HR per 1% increment 1.01; 95% CI 0.99-1.01, p = 0.07), but was significantly associated with HFH (HR per 1% increment 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p < 0.0001) and all-cause death (HR per 1% increment 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p < 0.0001). After adjusting for clinical as well as standard CMR parameters, the association of LACI remained significant for HFH and all-cause death. LACI showed incremental prognostic value for HFH in various multivariable models beyond traditional CMR parameters and global longitudinal strain. CONCLUSION: LACI is a significant predictor for all-cause death and HFH in a cohort with CCS and provides incremental prognostic value for HFH, beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors and imaging parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haney et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Chronic coronary syndrome (n=613). Left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.02, p=0.07). The left atrioventricular coupling index was not significantly associated with MACE (HR 1.01) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, but significantly predicted heart failure hospitalization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: