Key result
OCAD linked to ~91% higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Limited data exist on right ventricular function and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with versus without obstructive coronary artery disease.
Does the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease worsen right ventricular function and increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=331)
No
Does the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease worsen right ventricular function and increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
In patients with type 2 diabetes, the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with significantly worse right ventricular systolic and diastolic function and a nearly twofold increased risk of long-term adverse clinical outcomes.
OCAD flags higher-risk T2DM patients; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve RV function or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) marks a high-risk group within patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), underscoring the need for tailored prevention and management strategies. However, limited data exist on right ventricular (RV) function and clinical outcomes in T2DM patients with versus without OCAD. This study aimed to investigate the differences in RV function and clinical outcomes between these two groups. METHODS: The study included 246 T2DM patients {141 patients without OCAD [T2DM(OCAD-)] and 105 with [T2DM(OCAD+)]} and 85 control subjects. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance were utilized to assess RV structure, function, and global myocardial strain [including peak strain (PS), peak systolic (PSSR) and diastolic strain rate (PDSR) in longitudinal, circumferential, and radial directions]. The endpoints, which included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and overall composite outcome, were evaluated over a median follow-up period of 5.7 (3.1, 6.7) years. We used linear regression to identify determinants of impaired RV myocardial strain and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate their associations with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: RV global circumferential PS (GCPS), longitudinal PS (GLPS) and PSSR (PSSR-L) decreased progressively from control subjects to T2DM(OCAD-) patients, and further to T2DM(OCAD+) patients (all P < 0.05). The presence of OCAD was significantly correlated with impaired GRPS (β = - 0.186), GCPS (β = - 0.121), GLPS (β = - 0.153), PSSR-L (β = - 0.165), and PDSR-R (β = - 0.133) in the context of T2DM. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified OCAD as an independent predictor of future endpoints, with T2DM (OCAD+) patients showing a 1.91-fold increased risk compared to T2DM (OCAD-) patients (hazard ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-3.44; P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: T2DM patients with OCAD showed distinct RV functional impairments and worse long-term outcomes compared to those without OCAD, including more severe RV systolic and diastolic dysfunction and a significantly higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=331). Obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) vs. T2DM without OCAD was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and overall composite outcome (non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for unstable angina) (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.06-3.44, p=0.031). Obstructive coronary artery disease increased the risk of adverse clinical outcomes by 1.91-fold (HR 1.91) compared to patients without OCAD in the context of type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: