What question did this study set out to answer?

To test the external validity of Miller et al.'s (2009) social-cognitive model in predicting social justice interest and commitment among counseling psychology doctoral trainees.

January 1, 2011Journal of Counseling Psychology

Counseling psychology trainees' social justice interest and commitment.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To test the external validity of Miller et al.'s (2009) social-cognitive model in predicting social justice interest and commitment among counseling psychology doctoral trainees.
Surveyed a sample of N=229 doctoral trainees in counseling psychology.
Assessed structural pathways linking program training environment, personal moral imperative, and social justice interest and commitment.
Supported the external validity of the social-cognitive model, demonstrating its utility in partially explaining trainees' social justice interest and commitment.
Identified significant direct and indirect associations between the graduate training environment, personal moral imperative, and social justice outcomes.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Cross-sectional study reveals drivers of social justice commitment in counseling psychology trainees, highlighting the role of training environment and personal moral imperative.

Cite This Study

Miller et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f73ead13714ec96fe2cbd https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022663

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Cross-sectional study reveals drivers of social justice commitment in counseling psychology trainees, highlighting the role of training environment and personal moral imperative.

Counseling psychology trainees' social justice interest and commitment.

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Counseling psychology trainees' social justice interest and commitment.

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider