Key result
A postprocedural relative coronary flow velocity reserve <0.78 after coronary stenting was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac troponin T elevation (52.6% vs 5.6%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Is abnormal relative coronary flow velocity reserve (rCVR <0.78) after coronary intervention associated with cardiac marker elevation?
Observational (n=55)
Is abnormal relative coronary flow velocity reserve (rCVR <0.78) after coronary intervention associated with cardiac marker elevation?
Absolute Event Rate: 52.6% vs 5.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
A persistent reduction in relative coronary flow velocity reserve (rCVR <0.78) after successful coronary stenting is strongly associated with periprocedural myocardial injury, likely due to microvascular embolization.
rCVR <0.78 after stenting may flag periprocedural injury risk; observational data leaves open its role in PCI risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Residual reduction of relative coronary flow velocity reserve (rCVR) after successful coronary intervention has been related to microvascular impairment. However, the incidence of cardiac enzyme elevation as a surrogate marker of an underlying embolic myocardial injury in these cases has not been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: A series of 55 consecutive patients with successful coronary stenting, periprocedural intracoronary Doppler analysis, and determination of creatine kinase (CK; upper limit of normal [ULN] for women 70 IU/L, for men 80 IU/L) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT; bedside test, threshold 0.1 ng/mL) before and 6, 12, and 24 hours after intervention were studied. Postprocedural rCVR was the only intracoronary Doppler parameter that independently correlated with cTnT (r=-0.498, P<0.001) and CK outcome (r=-0.406, P=0.002). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a postprocedural rCVR of 0.78 as the best discriminating value, with a sensitivity of 83.3% and 69.2% and a specificity of 79.1% and 76.2% for detection of cTnT and CK elevation, respectively. Stratified according to this cutoff value, the incidence of cTnT elevation was 52.6% in patients with (n=19) and 5.6% in patients without (n=36) a postprocedural rCVR <0.78 (P<0.001), associated with a CK elevation >1 times the ULN in 36.8% and 5.6% (P=0.005) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac marker elevation can frequently be found after coronary procedures that are associated with a persistent reduction of rCVR, indicating procedural embolization of atherothrombotic debris with microvascular impairment and myocardial injury as a potential underlying mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herrmann et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Patients with successful coronary stenting (n=55). Postprocedural rCVR <0.78 vs. Postprocedural rCVR ≥0.78 was evaluated on Incidence of cTnT elevation (p=<0.001). A postprocedural relative coronary flow velocity reserve <0.78 after coronary stenting was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac troponin T elevation (52.6% vs 5.6%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: