Key result
Contrast-enhanced MRA with 3D reconstructions identified a common left-sided antrum in 75% of patients and yielded slightly larger pulmonary vein ostial diameters than 2D measurements.
Why the study?
Does contrast-enhanced MRA with 3D reconstructions improve the assessment of pulmonary vein anatomy compared to 2D multiplanar reconstructions in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for ablation?
Population
40 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation, mean age 53 +/- 9 years, scheduled for…
Comparison
Three-dimensional reconstructions of… vs Two-dimensional (2D) multiplanar reconstructions
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support 3D MRA for PV assessment in AF ablation planning; extends 2D data but leaves open impact on outcomes.
Observational (n=40)
Does contrast-enhanced MRA with 3D reconstructions improve the assessment of pulmonary vein anatomy compared to 2D multiplanar reconstructions in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for ablation?
MRA with 3D reconstructions provides detailed anatomical information and slightly larger diameter measurements of pulmonary veins compared to 2D imaging, which may aid in selecting appropriate tools for AF ablation.
Mlcochova et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=40). Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with 3D reconstructions vs. 2D multiplanar reconstructions was evaluated on Pulmonary vein ostial anatomy and diameters. Contrast-enhanced MRA with 3D reconstructions identified a common left-sided antrum in 75% of patients and yielded slightly larger pulmonary vein ostial diameters than 2D measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: