Key result
Clinical, imaging, and circulating biomarkers may improve ischemic stroke risk stratification in NVAF beyond CHA2DS2-VASc.
Why the study?
The CHA2DS2-VASc score has only moderate predictive power for ischemic stroke in non-valvular AF, prompting exploration of clinical biomarkers to assist in personalized risk evaluation.
While the CHA2DS2-VASc score remains the standard for stroke risk stratification in NVAF, emerging clinical, imaging, and circulating biomarkers may help refine personalized risk assessment.
May refine NVAF stroke risk assessment beyond CHA2DS2-VASc; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and results in a significantly increased ischemic stroke (IS) risk. IS risk stratification tools are widely being applied to guide anticoagulation treatment decisions and duration in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF). The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is largely validated and currently recommended by renowned guidelines. However, this score is heavily dependent on age, sex, and comorbidities, and exhibits only moderate predictive power. Finding effective and validated clinical biomarkers to assist in personalized IS risk evaluation has become one of the promising directions in the prevention and treatment of NVAF. A number of studies in recent years have explored differentially expressed biomarkers in NVAF patients with and without IS, and the potential role of various biomarkers for prediction or early diagnosis of IS in patients with NVAF. In this review, we describe the clinical application and utility of AF characteristics, cardiac imaging and electrocardiogram markers, arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis-related markers, circulating biomarkers, and novel genetic markers in IS diagnosis and management of patients with NVAF. We conclude that at present, there is no consensus understanding of a desirable biomarker for IS risk stratification in NVAF, and enrolling these biomarkers into extant models also remains challenging. Further prospective cohorts and trials are needed to integrate various clinical risk factors and biomarkers to optimize IS prediction in patients with NVAF. However, we believe that the growing insight into molecular mechanisms and in-depth understanding of existing and emerging biomarkers may further improve the IS risk identification and guide anticoagulation therapy in patients with NVAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shang et al. (2021) conducted a review in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF). Biomarkers for Ischemic Stroke Evaluation vs. CHA2DS2-VASc score was evaluated. Various clinical, imaging, and circulating biomarkers show potential to improve ischemic stroke risk stratification in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation beyond the CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: