Key result
Having ≥2 elevated routine biomarkers linked to ~11-fold higher stroke risk in non-valvular AF.
Why the study?
Most biomarkers in patients with atrial fibrillation have limited clinical use due to cost-effectiveness and complexity, necessitating evaluation of routine blood tests for risk stratification.
Do routine blood test biomarkers improve risk stratification for ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=537)
No
Do routine blood test biomarkers improve risk stratification for ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 11.5 (95% CI 3.3–40.2)
p-value: p=<0.001
Routine blood tests including RDW, creatinine, and PDW can significantly improve the prediction of ischemic stroke when added to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Routine biomarkers may refine AF risk stratification; leaves open incremental value beyond validated scores in prospective cohorts.
Background In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), most biomarkers are still of limited use due to cost-effectiveness and complexity in clinical practice. Hypotheses Biomarkers from routine blood tests improve the current risk stratification in AF patients. Methods This prospective study enrolled 600 patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF, of whom 537 were analyzed. Platelet count; platelet distribution width (PDW); red cell distribution width (RDW); and creatinine, D-dimer, and troponin I levels were measured at enrollment. Results During the mean follow-up period (2.2 ± 0.6 years), 1.9% patients developed ischemic stroke. According to the optimal cutoff of each biomarker, the risk of ischemic stroke was higher in patients with RDW ≥ 13.5%, creatinine ≥ 1.11 mg/dL, or PDW ≥ 13.2% (significant biomarkers; P value: < 0.01, 0.04, or 0.07, respectively). These 3 significant biomarkers had higher information gain than clinical risk factors in predicting ischemic stroke. The cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke was 1.2%, 1.1%, 8.4%, and 40.0% in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 significant biomarkers, respectively (P-for-trend < 0.001). Patients with ≥ 2 significant biomarkers had a significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke than those with < 2 significant biomarkers (adjusted hazard ratio 11.5, 95% confidence interval 3.3–40.2, P < 0.001). The predictability for ischemic stroke was significantly improved when ≥ 2 significant biomarkers were added to the CHA2DS2–VASc score (area under the curve 0.790 vs. 0.620, P = 0.043). Conclusion Routine blood tests can provide better risk stratification of AF along with clinical risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=537). ≥ 2 significant biomarkers (RDW ≥ 13.5%, creatinine ≥ 1.11 mg/dL, PDW ≥ 13.2%) vs. < 2 significant biomarkers was evaluated on Thromboembolic events (incident transient ischemic attack, ischemic stroke, or systemic arterial embolism) (adjusted HR 11.5, 95% CI 3.3-40.2, p=<0.001). The presence of ≥ 2 significant biomarkers (elevated RDW, creatinine, or PDW) significantly increased the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (adjusted HR 11.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: