Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Larvivorous fishes are important biological vector control agents. Gambusia affinis and Poecilia reticulata are the most well-known larvivorous fishes used around the world. But introducing exotic fish for biocontrol has adverse long-term impacts. Indigenous fishes with larvivorous potential are more sensible alternatives. Methodology: Time-bound predation experiments were conducted on three fish species, G. affinis, P. reticulata, and Esomus danrica, using mosquito larvae as prey. A total of 90 experiments were conducted, 30 on G. affinis, 30 on P. reticulata, and another 30 experiments on E. danrica. Results: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare the larvivorous capacity of the three fish species. The ANOVA revealed a significant difference in mean scores, F (2, 87) = 10.421, P-value < 0.001. Post hoc comparison was done using Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test, which revealed a significant difference in larvivorous capacity of G. affinis with P. reticulata (P-value = 0.010) and E. danrica (P-value = <0.001) individually. However, no significant difference was found in the larvivorous capacity between P. reticulata and E. danrica (P-value = 0.292, effect size (Cohen's d) = 0.417 (small)). The mean larval consumption was 11.60 (standard deviation (SD) = 3.635) for G. affinis, 9.10 (SD = 2.771) for P. reticulata, and 7.83 (SD = 3.291) for E. danrica. Conclusions: Our native larvivorous fish (E. danrica) showed promising larvivorous capacity. There is a need for further studies that consider additional factors influencing larvivorous capacity, as well as field experiments to determine larvivorous efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: