Key result
Among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke across five US health plan databases, only 19% to 51% received an anticoagulant medication, indicating substantial undertreatment.
Why the study?
What is the pattern of anticoagulant use for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation across multiple health plan databases?
Observational (n=105,397)
What is the pattern of anticoagulant use for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation across multiple health plan databases?
A large proportion of high-risk atrial fibrillation patients across multiple health plan databases do not receive guideline-recommended anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention.
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation is recommended for stroke prevention in intermediate/high stroke risk atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of analytic software tools for descriptive analyses of disease management in atrial AF; a secondary objective is to demonstrate patterns of potential anticoagulant undertreatment in AF. METHODS: Retrospective data analyses were performed using the Anticoagulant Quality Improvement Analyzer (AQuIA), a software tool designed to analyze health plan data. Two-year data from five databases were analyzed: IMS LifeLink (IMS), MarketScan Commercial (MarketScanCommercial), MarketScan Medicare Supplemental (MarketScanMedicare), Clinformatics™ DataMart, a product of OptumInsight Life Sciences (Optum), and a Medicaid Database (Medicaid). Included patients were ≥ 18 years old with a new or existing diagnosis of AF. The first observed AF diagnosis constituted the index date, with patient outcomes assessed over a one year period. Key study measures included stroke risk level, anticoagulant use, and frequency of International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring. RESULTS: High stroke risk (CHADS2 ≥ 2 points) was estimated in 54% (IMS), 22% (MarketScanCommercial), 64% (MarketscanMedicare), 42% (Optum) and 62% (Medicaid) of the total eligible population. Overall, 35%, 29%, 38%, 39% and 16% of all AF patients received an anticoagulant medication in IMS, MarketScanCommercial, MarketScanMedicare, Optum and Medicaid, respectively. Among patients at high risk for stroke, 19% to 51% received any anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: The AQuIA provided a consistent platform for analysis across multiple AF populations with varying baseline characteristics. Analyzer results show that many high-risk AF patients in selected commercial, Medicare-eligible, and Medicaid populations do not receive appropriate thromboprophylaxis, as recommended by treatment guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lang et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=105,397). Anticoagulant medication was evaluated on Proportion of high stroke risk patients receiving an anticoagulant medication. Among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke across five US health plan databases, only 19% to 51% received an anticoagulant medication, indicating substantial undertreatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: