Key result
MRI-derived EOA shows a strong 0.76 correlation with TTE-derived EOA in moderately accelerated aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
In aortic stenosis, discrepancy between moderately accelerated flow and effective orifice area remains challenging, and severity currently can be determined only by echocardiography.
Does MRI-derived effective orifice area (MRI-EOA) accurately estimate aortic stenosis severity compared to TTE-EOA in patients with moderately accelerated aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=40)
No
Does MRI-derived effective orifice area (MRI-EOA) accurately estimate aortic stenosis severity compared to TTE-EOA in patients with moderately accelerated aortic stenosis?
MRI-derived effective orifice area using 3D streamline reconstruction provides a viable alternative to echocardiography for assessing aortic stenosis severity, particularly in patients with moderately accelerated flow and discordant echocardiographic parameters.
PURPOSE: In aortic stenosis (AS), the discrepancy between moderately accelerated flow and effective orifice area (EOA) continues to pose a challenge. We developed a method of measuring the vena contracta area as hemodynamic EOA using cardiac MRI focusing on AS patients with a moderately accelerated flow to solve the problem that AS severity can currently be determined only by echocardiography. METHODS: We investigated 40 patients with a peak transvalvular velocity > 3.0 m/s on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The patients were divided into highly accelerated and moderately accelerated AS groups according to whether or not the peak transvalvular velocity was ≥ 4.0 m/s. From the multislice 2D cine phase-contrast MRI data, the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta of the reconstructed streamline in the Valsalva sinus was defined as MRI-EOAs. Patient symptoms and echocardiography data, including EOA (defined as TTE-EOA), were derived from the continuity equation using TTE. CONCLUSION: MRI-EOAs may be an alternative to conventional echocardiography for patients with moderately accelerated AS, especially those with discordant echocardiographic parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hohri et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis (n=40). Multislice 2D cine phase-contrast MRI (MRI-EOA) vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE-EOA) was evaluated on Correlation between MRI-EOA and TTE-EOA in moderately accelerated aortic stenosis (r = 0.76, p=<0.001). Multislice 2D cine phase-contrast MRI-derived effective orifice area demonstrated a strong correlation with transthoracic echocardiography-derived effective orifice area (r = 0.76) in patients with moderately accelerated aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: