Key result
Fontan circulation is linked to lower atrial strain but shows no difference in pressure-strain index.
Why the study?
Atrial function is associated with exercise tolerance and survival in patients with Fontan circulation, but the atrial pressure-strain relationship has not been well studied.
Does Fontan circulation alter the atrial pressure-strain relationship and atrial strain parameters compared to controls with biventricular circulation?
Observational (n=26)
No
Does Fontan circulation alter the atrial pressure-strain relationship and atrial strain parameters compared to controls with biventricular circulation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.2% vs 0.2%
p-value: p=0.417
While atrial reservoir and conduit strains are significantly reduced in patients with Fontan circulation, the pressure-strain index does not significantly differ from controls, casting doubt on the physiological significance of the atrial pressure-strain relationship in this unique hemodynamic setting.
Impaired Fontan atrial strains should not yet guide management; leaves open whether pressure-strain index refines risk stratification beyond strain alone.
PURPOSE: Atrial function is associated with exercise tolerance and survival in patients with Fontan circulation. Although atrial function is often evaluated using strain parameters, changes in atrial pressure are also important but have not been well studied. This study aimed to investigate the atrial pressure-strain relationship in patients with Fontan circulation using data from cardiac catheterization and MRI. METHODS: We retrospectively included 16 patients (median age: 12 years) who underwent cardiac MRI between 2020 and 2026, and 10 control patients (median age: 8.5 years). Atrial strain values were evaluated from 4-chamber cine MRI images. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure waveforms were used as a surrogate for atrial pressure. The pressure-strain index was calculated as an integrated measure of atrial pressure and strain. RESULTS: , P = 0.007). Reservoir and conduit strains were lower in the Fontan group (reservoir strain: 16.7 vs. 26.2%, P < 0.001; conduit strain: 6.2 vs. 18.7%, P < 0.001); however, no significant difference was observed in pump strain between the groups. No significant difference was also noted in pressure-strain index between the 2 groups (0.2 vs. 0.2, P = 0.417). CONCLUSION: In patients with Fontan physiology, reservoir and conduit strain were lower than in controls. In contrast, atrial pressure-strain relationship was not clearly associated with conventional Fontan hemodynamic parameters. These findings suggest that the physiological significance of atrial pressure-strain relationship in the Fontan circulation remains uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oka et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Fontan circulation (n=26). Fontan circulation vs. Biventricular circulation with normal cardiac function was evaluated on Atrial pressure-strain index (p=0.417). Patients with Fontan circulation showed significantly lower reservoir and conduit strains than controls, but the atrial pressure-strain index did not differ significantly (0.20 vs. 0.20, P=0.417).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: