Phase II trial finds very low rituximab doses achieve only transient B-cell depletion in autoimmune hemolytic anemia, indicating higher sustained plasma concentrations are required.
Introduction Although rituximab is approved for several autoimmune diseases, no formal dose finding studies have been conducted. The amount of CD20+ cells differs significantly between autoimmune diseases and B-cell malignancies. Hence, dose requirements of anti-CD20 therapies may differ accordingly. Methods We conducted a phase II pilot trial investigating the effects and safety of very low doses of rituximab, i.e., 5 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks, 20 mg every 4 weeks, 50 mg every 3 months ( n = 3 each) and 100 mg every 3 months ( n = 1) in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) to effectively suppress CD20 + cell counts. Doses were increased if circulating CD20 + cell depletion was insufficient (i.e., <95% reduction from baseline) in a dose group. Plasma rituximab concentrations were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, CD20 + cell counts were determined by flow cytometry. Results Ten patients were included in the final analysis (7 with cold agglutinin disease, 2 with warm AIHA, 1 with mixed-type AIHA). The first infusion depleted ≥95% of CD20 + cells in all but one of the included patients. However, the dosing regimens were found ineffective, because a sustained CD20 + cell depletion was not achieved, and CD20 + cells recovered with a high interindividual variability. CD20 + lymphocytes were below the detection limit if rituximab plasma concentrations exceeded 0.4 μg/mL. One endokarditis occured. Conclusion Rituximab doses as low as 5 mg/m 2 transiently depleted CD20 + cells in almost all patients, but the tested low-dose regimens failed to permanently suppress CD20 + cells. The empirically identified EC95% of 0.4 μg/mL rituximab may guide future studies using low-doses of rituximab. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ , identifier [EudraCT 2016-002478-11].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moser et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: