Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Learnable embedding vector is one of the most important applications in machine learning, and is widely used in various database-related domains. However, the high dimensionality of sparse data in recommendation tasks and the huge volume of corpus in retrieval-related tasks lead to a large memory consumption of the embedding table, which poses a great challenge to the training and deployment of models. Recent research has proposed various methods to compress the embeddings at the cost of a slight decrease in model quality or the introduction of other overheads. Nevertheless, the relative performance of these methods remains unclear. Existing experimental comparisons only cover a subset of these methods and focus on limited metrics. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive comparative analysis and experimental evaluation of embedding compression. We introduce a new taxonomy that categorizes these techniques based on their characteristics and methodologies, and further develop a modular benchmarking framework that integrates 14 representative methods. Under a uniform test environment, our benchmark fairly evaluates each approach, presents their strengths and weaknesses under different memory budgets, and recommends the best method based on the use case. In addition to providing useful guidelines, our study also uncovers the limitations of current methods and suggests potential directions for future research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hailin Zhang
Xidian University
Penghao Zhao
Peking University
Xupeng Miao
Purdue University West Lafayette
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Carnegie Mellon University
Peking University
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f97275725bbd5cc5fe37e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.14778/3636218.3636234
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: