Questions the basis of Schmitt's political theology in divine revelation, finding it rooted in epistemic faith.
The theological turn in studies of Carl Schmitt is pronounced. This paper does not challenge this turn, but questions what theology means for Schmitt. Specifically, it challenges the assumption that Schmitt's political theology is grounded in divine revelation. By distinguishing between “theology in the sense of divine revelation” and “theology in the sense of epistemic faith,” it argues that Schmitt's political theology is epistemic in origin. Schmitt's political theology is not rooted in faith in divine revelation, but in the narrower notion that human cognition is, ultimately, rooted in faith not reason, revelation, or common sense.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gavin Rae (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: