Key result
Automated natural language processing detects recurrent AF at a ~2.5x higher rate than code-based approaches.
Why the study?
The study aimed to develop and apply natural language processing algorithms to electronic health records to identify recurrent AF episodes following rhythm control therapy initiation.
Does an automated natural language processing algorithm improve the identification of recurrent atrial fibrillation compared to a code-based approach in adults initiating rhythm control therapy?
Cohort (n=22,970)
Yes
Does an automated natural language processing algorithm improve the identification of recurrent atrial fibrillation compared to a code-based approach in adults initiating rhythm control therapy?
An automated NLP algorithm applied to electronic health records significantly improves the detection of recurrent atrial fibrillation compared to traditional billing code-based approaches.
NLP may improve AF recurrence detection in EHRs beyond codes; leaves open effects on outcomes research and practice.
AIMS: This study aimed to develop and apply natural language processing (NLP) algorithms to identify recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes following rhythm control therapy initiation using electronic health records (EHRs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We included adults with new-onset AF who initiated rhythm control therapies (ablation, cardioversion, or antiarrhythmic medication) within two US integrated healthcare delivery systems. A code-based algorithm identified potential AF recurrence using diagnosis and procedure codes. An automated NLP algorithm was developed and validated to capture AF recurrence from electrocardiograms, cardiac monitor reports, and clinical notes. Compared with the reference standard cases confirmed by physicians' adjudication, the F-scores, sensitivity, and specificity were all above 0.90 for the NLP algorithms at both sites. We applied the NLP and code-based algorithms to patients with incident AF (n = 22 970) during the 12 months after initiating rhythm control therapy. Applying the NLP algorithms, the percentages of patients with AF recurrence for sites 1 and 2 were 60.7% and 69.9% (ablation), 64.5% and 73.7% (cardioversion), and 49.6% and 55.5% (antiarrhythmic medication), respectively. In comparison, the percentages of patients with code-identified AF recurrence for sites 1 and 2 were 20.2% and 23.7% for ablation, 25.6% and 28.4% for cardioversion, and 20.0% and 27.5% for antiarrhythmic medication, respectively. CONCLUSION: When compared with a code-based approach alone, this study's high-performing automated NLP method identified significantly more patients with recurrent AF. The NLP algorithms could enable efficient evaluation of treatment effectiveness of AF therapies in large populations and help develop tailored interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=22,970). Natural language processing (NLP) algorithm vs. Code-based algorithm was evaluated on Identification of recurrent atrial fibrillation. An automated natural language processing algorithm identified recurrent atrial fibrillation in 49.6-73.7% of patients across therapies, compared to 20.0-28.4% using a code-based approach alone.