Key result
Transtelephonic ECG and serial 7-day Holter were equally effective in determining long-term success after AF ablation, showing freedom from AF in 45% and 50% of patients at 6 months, respectively.
Why the study?
Does transtelephonic ECG every 2 days compared to serial 7-day Holter improve the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences in patients post-ablation?
Population
30 patients with highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation selected for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation
Comparison
Transtelephonic ECG transmitted once every 2… vs Serial 7-day Holter recorded preablation, after…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports comparable post-ablation AF detection with either method; hypothesis-generating pending randomized validation.
Observational (n=30)
Does transtelephonic ECG every 2 days compared to serial 7-day Holter improve the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrences in patients post-ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 45% vs 50%
Objective rhythm monitoring with either transtelephonic ECG or serial 7-day Holter detects significantly more asymptomatic AF recurrences post-ablation compared to symptom-based follow-up alone.
Piorkowski et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation (n=30). Transtelephonic ECG every 2 days vs. Serial 7-day Holter was evaluated on Freedom from AF at 6 months. Transtelephonic ECG and serial 7-day Holter were equally effective in determining long-term success after AF ablation, showing freedom from AF in 45% and 50% of patients at 6 months, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: