Key result
Doppler-estimated carotid and brachial flows fail to reliably estimate cardiac index non-invasively.
Why the study?
Does Doppler-estimated peripheral arterial blood flow correlate with cardiac index in human volunteers?
Observational (n=11)
Does Doppler-estimated peripheral arterial blood flow correlate with cardiac index in human volunteers?
Doppler-estimated peripheral arterial blood flows show only a weak correlation with cardiac index and cannot be used to provide non-invasive estimates of cardiac index in humans.
Peripheral Doppler flows should not estimate cardiac index; leaves open validation of reliable non-invasive alternatives.
We measured carotid and brachial artery blood flow by Doppler ultrasound in 11 human volunteers, and related these to cardiac index and to each other. The median (IQR [range]) carotid arterial blood flow was 0.334 (0.223-0.381 [0.052-0.563]) l.min(-1) on the right and 0.315 (0.223-0.369 [0.061-0.690]) l.min(-1) on the left. The brachial arterial blood flow was 0.049 (0.033-0.062 [0.015-0.204]) l.min(-1) on the right and 0.039 (0.027-0.054 [0.011-0.116]) on the left. Cardiac index was 3.2 (2.8-3.5 [1.9-5.4]) l.min(-1) .m(-2) . There was a moderate to good correlation between right-and left-sided flows (brachial: ρ = 0.45; carotid: ρ = 0.567). Brachial and carotid flow had no or a negative correlation with cardiac index (right brachial: ρ = -0.145, left brachial: ρ = -0.349; right carotid: ρ = -0.376, left carotid: ρ = -0.285). In contrast to some previous studies, we found that Doppler-estimated peripheral arterial blood flows only show a weak correlation with cardiac index and cannot be used to provide non-invasive estimates of cardiac index in man.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weber et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Human volunteers (n=11). Doppler ultrasound was evaluated on Correlation between carotid and brachial artery flow and cardiac index. Doppler-estimated carotid and brachial artery blood flows showed weak or negative correlations with cardiac index (e.g., right carotid ρ = -0.376) and cannot provide non-invasive estimates.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: