Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Erratum corrections leave RCT infarct size results unchanged; confirms original conclusions for clinical use and further research.
On page 30, right hand column, line 7 should read: and the percentage reduction in infarct size and not: and the percentage reduction in heart size and line 13 should read: ated with a non-significant increase in the infarct and not: ated with a non-significant decrease in the infarct
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Kjekshus (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: