Why the study?
This review aims to summarize the current state of the art and future directions in optimal long-term anticoagulation following acute pulmonary embolism.
DOACs are the preferred choice for long-term anticoagulation after acute pulmonary embolism based on individualized risk assessment, except in specific conditions like CTEPH and APS where VKAs remain the standard of care.
Reinforces DOAC preference post-PE except CTEPH/APS; leaves open dedicated prospective trials in these subgroups.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the current state of the art and future directions in optimal long-term anticoagulation following acute pulmonary embolism (PE). RECENT FINDINGS: Actual studies and guidelines underscore the preference for direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in standard therapeutic doses for maintenance therapy post-PE, while considering patient-specific factors and dose-reduction criteria. Risk stratification should always include the assessment of concomitant trigger- or risk factors regarding their strength and persistence. The use of tools like specific scores can facilitate the identification of optimal candidates for long-term therapy, emphasizing once more personalized approaches and strategies. Special patient groups, such as cancer associated thrombosis, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension or antiphospholipid syndrome require even more tailored therapy approaches. SUMMARY: Optimal long-term anticoagulation post-PE should be guided by straightforward and individual risk assessment strategies. The array of indications for DOACs has gotten wider in last years, also within special patient groups. Still, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and antiphospholipid syndrome remains domain of vitamin K agonists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimmerle et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: