Why the study?
Do direct oral anticoagulants offer an effective and safe alternative to conventional therapy in the treatment of pulmonary embolism?
Do direct oral anticoagulants offer an effective and safe alternative to conventional therapy in the treatment of pulmonary embolism?
DOACs provide an effective, potentially safer, and more convenient alternative to conventional heparin/VKA therapy for pulmonary embolism, though data in high-risk and cancer populations remain limited.
Supports DOAC consideration in PE; leaves open optimal selection and duration in diverse populations.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to examine the management strategies for pulmonary embolism (PE) with an emphasis of the role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). METHODS: PubMed was searched to identify relevant journal articles published through April 2017. Additional references were obtained from articles discovered during the database search. RESULTS: Initial heparinization followed by long-term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists has been considered the mainstay for the treatment of PE. However, DOACs now offer comparably effective and potentially safer alternatives for both acute and long-term treatment of PE using a monotherapy approach without the need for initial heparinization for rivaroxaban or apixaban. Advantages to using DOACs include oral availability, rapid onset of action, minimal drug and food interactions, predictable pharmacokinetics, and lack of need for routine monitoring. Limitations of using these agents include a limited availability of assays to quickly and efficiently measure their anticoagulant effects and the lack of widely available reversal agents for the direct oral factor Xa inhibitors; although idarucizumab has recently been approved for the reversal of dabigatran's anticoagulant effects. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages to using DOACs render them an attractive alternative to conventional therapy in PE treatment that may simplify acute and long-term treatment paradigms, improve patient outcomes, and increase patient compliance. However, questions remain pertaining to the use of DOACs in PE patients with high-risk features and in cancer patients and fragile populations. Clinical studies are under way to address many of these issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eldredge et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: