Key result
Implantable cardiac devices require cross-specialty familiarity with indications and complications to provide holistic care.
Why the study?
Heart diseases are leading causes of mortality worldwide, and practitioners across specialties need familiarity with implantable cardiac devices for managing different cardiac conditions while providing holistic care.
This review provides an overview of commonly implanted cardiac devices to familiarize practitioners across specialties with their management.
Emphasizes cross-specialty device literacy for holistic care; leaves open standardized training protocols.
Heart diseases are common life-threatening acute diseases. They are leading causes of mortality worldwide, especially significant in developed countries. Other than medications for therapies and prophylaxis, special treatment considerations with implantable cardiac devices are important to reduce mortality and medical disability. This paper aims to review indications, contraindications, efficacy, complications, and generic considerations of several commonly implanted cardiac devices including pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization devices, implantable cardiac defibrillators, left atrial appendage occlusion watchman devices, and ventricular assist devices. As various implantable therapeutic cardiac devices are sometimes carried in the bodies of patients with cardiac disease, practitioners of various specialties should be familiar with different cardiac devices on the management of different cardiac conditions while providing holistic care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christine et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart diseases. Implantable cardiac devices was evaluated. Implantable cardiac devices, including pacemakers, ICDs, and VADs, require practitioners across specialties to be familiar with their indications, efficacy, and complications to provide holistic care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: