Key result
Protocol tests if pharmacogenomic-guided DAPT reduces MACE versus standard care in post-PCI Caribbean Hispanics.
Why the study?
CYP2C19 genotyping-guided antiplatelet therapy had not yet been tested among Hispanics, who are disproportionately affected by cardiovascular conditions.
Does pharmacogenomic-guided DAPT reduce MACEs compared to standard-of-care clopidogrel in post-PCI Caribbean Hispanic patients with ACS or CAD?
Does pharmacogenomic-guided DAPT reduce MACEs compared to standard-of-care clopidogrel in post-PCI Caribbean Hispanic patients with ACS or CAD?
This protocol describes a non-randomised trial to test whether a CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic-driven algorithm for DAPT is superior to standard clopidogrel therapy in Caribbean Hispanic patients post-PCI.
Introduction Minority populations in the USA are disproportionately affected by cardiovascular conditions. Reduced responsiveness to clopidogrel among carriers of CYP2C19 variants has been reported in patients with either coronary artery disease (CAD) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Previous studies have evaluated CYP2C19 genotyping-guided antiplatelet therapy in selected populations; however, this has yet to be tested among Hispanics. Given the paucity of clinical research on CYP2C19 and antiplatelet clinical outcomes in Hispanics, our study will test the safety and efficacy of a genetic-driven treatment algorithm to guide dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in Caribbean Hispanics. Methods and analysis This is a multicentre, prospective, non-randomised clinical trial that proposes an assessment of pharmacogenomic-guided DAPT in post-PCI Caribbean Hispanic patients with ACS or CAD. We will recruit 250 patients to be compared with a matched non-concurrent cohort of 250 clopidogrel-treated patients (standard-of-care). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) such as all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary revascularisation, stent thrombosis and bleedings over 6 months will be the study endpoints. Among the recruited, high-risk patients will be escalated to ticagrelor and low-risk patients will remain on clopidogrel. The primary objective is to determine whether genetic-guided therapy is superior to standard of care. The secondary objective will determine if clopidogrel treatment in low-risk patients is not associated with a higher rate of MACEs compared with escalated antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients. Patients will be enrolled up to the group’s completion. Ethics and dissemination Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus (protocol # A4070417). The study will be carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and controlled access to experimental data will be available. Trial registration number NCT03419325 ; Pre-results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández-Suárez et al. (2020) studied Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or coronary artery disease (CAD) post-PCI (n=500). Pharmacogenomic-guided dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. Standard-of-care (clopidogrel) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularisation, stent thrombosis and bleedings. This protocol outlines a non-randomized trial of 500 Caribbean Hispanic patients post-PCI to test if pharmacogenomic-guided DAPT is superior to standard of care for 6-month MACE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: