Key result
Intermittent levosimendan is linked to improved cardiac function in advanced HFrEF regardless of AF.
Why the study?
It was uncertain whether the therapeutic effects of levosimendan differ in advanced HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm compared to those with AF.
Does intermittent repeated levosimendan infusion have different therapeutic effects in advanced HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm compared to those with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=63)
No
Does intermittent repeated levosimendan infusion have different therapeutic effects in advanced HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm compared to those with atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=>0.05
Intermittent repeated levosimendan infusion provides similar surrogate marker changes in advanced HFrEF patients regardless of whether they have sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation.
May support intermittent levosimendan regardless of rhythm in advanced HFrEF; leaves open randomized confirmation of clinical outcomes.
Patients with advanced heart failure have a high incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and develop into heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and require higher doses of inotropes. However, it is uncertain about the differences in the effects of levosimendan in HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm or AF. A total of 63 advanced HFrEF subjects (ejection fraction < 40%) were divided into sinus rhythm (SR, n = 34) and atrial fibrillation (AF, n = 29) cohorts. All patients received six cycles of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusion. After 3 months of treatment, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), estimated glomerular filtration rate, resting heart rate (rHR), creatinine, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic diameter and blood pressure body weight, NYHA classification were measured. After completing the course of treatment, LVEF, BNP, and rHR were significantly decreased ( p < 0.0.5), and no significant differences between the two groups were observed ( p > 0.05). The NYHA classification improved in the SR group but not in the AF group. There was no significant difference between patients with different rHRs (≤70 bpm vs. >70 bpm) in the SR group ( p > 0.05) or in the AF group (rHR ≤ 90 bpm vs. rHR >90 bpm) ( p > 0.05). This study showed no difference in the therapeutic effect of intermittent repeated levosimendan infusion on advanced HFrEF with different heart rhythms (SR or AF); Advanced HFrEF patients receive levosimendan treatment without taking the inference of heart rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=63). Levosimendan vs. Atrial fibrillation (AF) vs Sinus rhythm (SR) response was evaluated on Difference in therapeutic effect (changes in LVEF, BNP, LVEDD, NYHA) between SR and AF groups (p=>0.05). Intermittent repeated levosimendan infusion improved cardiac function in advanced HFrEF patients, with no significant difference in therapeutic effect between patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: