Key result
CTI ablation in elderly AFL with HF links to ~185% greater LVEF improvement and reduced mortality.
Why the study?
Data on cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) for typical atrial flutter in elderly patients with heart failure were rare.
Does cavotricuspid isthmus ablation improve LVEF and reduce cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization in elderly patients (60-85 years) with typical atrial flutter and HFrEF/HFmrEF?
Cohort (n=96)
Yes
Does cavotricuspid isthmus ablation improve LVEF and reduce cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization in elderly patients (60-85 years) with typical atrial flutter and HFrEF/HFmrEF?
Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in elderly patients with typical atrial flutter and HFrEF/HFmrEF significantly improves LVEF and reduces 2-year mortality compared to medical therapy alone.
Hypothesis-generating for CTIA benefit in elderly AFL-HF; RCTs needed before practice change.
Introduction While in the CASTLE-AF trial, in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, interventional therapy using pulmonary vein isolation was associated with outcome improvement, data on cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) in atrial flutter (AFL) in the elderly is rare. Methods We included 96 patients between 60 and 85 years with typical AFL and heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) treated in two medical centers. 48 patients underwent an electrophysiological study with CTIA, whereas 48 patients received rate or rhythm control and guideline-compliant heart failure therapy. Patients were followed up for 2 years, with emphasis on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiac causes. Results Patients with CTIA showed a significant increase in LVEF after 1 ( p < 0.001) and 2 years ( p < 0.001) in contrast to baseline LVEF. Improvement of LVEF in the CTIA group was associated with significantly lower 2-year mortality ( p = 0.003). In the multivariate regression analysis, CTIA remained the relevant factor associated with LVEF improvement (HR: 2.845 CI:95% 1.044–7.755; p = 0.041). Elderly patients (≥ 70 years) further benefited from CTIA, since they showed a significantly reduced rehospitalization ( p = 0.042) and mortality rate after 2 years ( p = 0.013). Conclusions CTIA in patients with typical AFL and HFrEF/HFmrEF was associated with significant improvement of LVEF and reduced mortality rates after 2 years. Patient age should not be a primary exclusion criterion for CTIA, since patients ≥70 years also seem to benefit from intervention in terms of mortality and hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boxhammer et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Typical atrial flutter and heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) (n=96). Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) vs. Medical therapy (rate or rhythm control and heart failure therapy) was evaluated on LVEF improvement (HR 2.845, 95% CI 1.044-7.755, p=0.041). Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in elderly patients with typical atrial flutter and heart failure was associated with a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 2.845) and reduced 2-year mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: