Why the study?
Does eliminating patient copayments for essential antihypertensive medications improve adherence and hypertension control in adults with hypertension?
Does eliminating patient copayments for essential antihypertensive medications improve adherence and hypertension control in adults with hypertension?
Eliminating out-of-pocket costs for antihypertensive medications is a feasible and economically sound strategy to improve medication adherence and blood pressure control globally.
Hypertension kills more people than any other condition; approximately 80% of deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Only about 1 in 5 adults with hypertension worldwide and less than 1 in 10 in LMICs have their condition controlled. Adherence to antihypertensive medications increases control and decreases hospitalizations, strokes, heart attacks, and health care costs. Eliminating patient copayments for antihypertensive medications increases adherence and hypertension control. This powerful but underutilized strategy can advance universal health coverage and reduce economic hardship. Medication access with no out-of-pocket cost to patients is feasible and economically sound, but requires increased investment and careful implementation to avoid unintended consequences of reducing flexible funding needed for primary health care systems. Provision of medications that are free to patients at the point of care should be part of a multi-component, sustainable approach to addresses systemic barriers to treatment of hypertension, the world's leading cause of death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frieden et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: