Key result
Porcine testing reveals no mechanical stiffness differences across age groups or between right and left ventricles.
Why the study?
Evaluating fetal heart mechanical function is crucial in congenital heart diseases, but fetal myocardium mechanical properties have not been well characterized, limiting the reliability of finite element modelling.
Fetal and neonatal porcine myocardium shows similar passive mechanical stiffness across late gestational ages and between ventricles, informing future finite element modeling of fetal hearts.
Supports uniform stiffness assumptions for fetal heart models; leaves open human tissue validation.
The evaluation of fetal heart mechanical function is becoming increasingly important for determining the prognosis and making subsequent decisions on the treatment and management of congenital heart diseases. Finite Element (FE) modelling can potentially provide detailed information on fetal hearts, and help perform virtual interventions to assist in predicting outcomes and supporting clinical decisions. Previous FE studies have enabled an improved understanding of healthy and diseased fetal heart biomechanics. However, to date, the mechanical properties of the fetal myocardium have not been well characterized which limits the reliability of such modelling. Here, we characterize the passive mechanical properties of late fetal and neonatal porcine hearts via biaxial mechanical testing as a surrogate for human fetal heart mechanical properties. We used samples from both the right and left ventricles over the late gestational period from 85 days of gestation to birth. Constitutive modelling was subsequently performed with a transversely isotropic Fung-type model and a Humphrey-type model, using fiber orientations identified with histology. We found no significant difference in mechanical stiffness across all age groups and between the right and left ventricular samples. This was likely due to the similarity in LV and RV pressures in the fetal heart, and similar gestational maturity across these late gestational ages. We thus recommend using the constitutive model for the average stress-stress behaviour of the tissues in future modelling work. Furthermore, we characterized the variability of the stiffness to inform such work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2022) studied Fetal porcine myocardium (surrogate for human fetal heart). Biaxial mechanical testing and constitutive modelling vs. Right vs left ventricles across age groups was evaluated on Mechanical stiffness. Biaxial mechanical testing of late fetal and neonatal porcine hearts revealed no significant difference in mechanical stiffness across age groups or between right and left ventricular samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: