Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a software framework that enables teachers to design reliable, personalised conversational agents tailored to their pedagogical goals and student learning preferences. The system combines a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture with a visual configuration environment, allowing educators to upload, validate, and organise domain-specific teaching materials into a teacher-curated content corpus. Educators can configure adaptive tutoring strategies based on the VARK model (Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, Kinesthetic), allowing the conversational agents to address diverse learning preferences and educational contexts. Unlike fully autonomous or black-box educational AI systems, this approach foregrounds teacher agency and pedagogical alignment, enabling intuitive control over content and interaction style. A preliminary evaluation with university educators assessed usability (SUS), perceived utility (UTAUT), cognitive load (NASA-TLX), and creative-technical capacity (CTS), revealing promising results and informing future design directions. The system supports the development of human-centred AI tutors that are transparent, configurable, and grounded in teacher expertise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valtolina et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: