Why the study?
CVD is the leading cause of death globally with diabetes mellitus as a major modifiable risk factor, prompting the development of a long-term quality-of-care score to predict AMI occurrence in type 2 DM.
Does a higher long-term quality-of-care score predict a reduced risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Does a higher long-term quality-of-care score predict a reduced risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
A higher long-term quality-of-care score is significantly associated with a reduced risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
May support quality-of-care scores for AMI risk stratification in T2DM; leaves open causality and needs prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally, and diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-established risk factor. Among the risk factors for CVD, DM is a major modifiable factor. In the fatal CVD outcomes, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most common cause of death. AIM: To develop a long-term quality-of-care score for predicting the occurrence of AMI among patients with type 2 DM on the basis of the hypothesis that good quality of care can reduce the risk of AMI in patients with DM. METHODS: ), and co-morbidity of hypertension. The associations between the score and the incidence of AMI were evaluated using Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 7351 patients who had sufficient information to calculate the score were enrolled. In comparison with participants who had scores ≤ 1, those with scores between 2 and 4 had a lower risk of developing AMI [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 0.71; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.55-0.90], and those with scores ≥ 5 had an even lower risk (AHR = 0.37; 95%CI: 0.21-0.66). CONCLUSION: Good quality of care can reduce the risk of AMI in patients with type 2 DM. The quality-of-care score developed in this study had a significant association with the risk of AMI and thus can be applied to guiding the care for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: