Why the study?
Do therapies initiated in non-tertiary hospitals prevent or treat cardiogenic shock and reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Population
Adults with acute myocardial infarction presenting to non-tertiary hospitals without invasive cardiac…
Comparison
Therapies for preventing and treating… vs Standard care or alternative management strategies
Design
Systematic_review
Authors
Loading...
Supports early fibrinolysis and transfer protocols in non-tertiary AMI care; confirms high-level evidence for cardiogenic shock prevention across ages.
Do therapies initiated in non-tertiary hospitals prevent or treat cardiogenic shock and reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
In non-tertiary hospitals, early fibrinolysis and transfer for revascularization are supported by high-level evidence to prevent cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction.
O’Connor et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: